Orange Alert

Hille Paakkunainen

Hille Paakkunainen

Hille Paakkunainen

Associate Professor

CONTACT

Philosophy
532 Hall of Languages
Email: hpaakkun@syr.edu
Office:

PROGRAM AFFILIATIONS

Ethics [ILM]
Health Humanities [ILM]

Degrees

  • PhD, University of Pittsburgh
CV

Courses Taught

PHI 860 Practical and Theoretical Reasoning (Graduate), Fall 2020
PHI 850 Epistemic Consequentialism, Virtue Theory, and Deontology (Graduate), Fall 2019
PHI 860 Motivation (Graduate), Spring 2019
PHI 860 Constructivism in Metaethics (Graduate), Fall 2017

PHI 192 Introduction to Moral Theory (Undergraduate), Fall 2020
PHI 396 / BIO 396 / REL 359 Stem Cells & Society (Undergraduate), Spring 2019
PHI 387 Epistemology (Undergraduate), Fall 2018
PHI 393 Contemporary Ethics (Undergraduate), Spring 2018

Research and Teaching Interests

Hille Paakkunainen works in Metaethics, Epistemology, and Philosophy of Action. Most of her work thus far concerns the nature of various normative phenomena, such as having a good reason for doing something, or being justified in believing something; and the relationship between such phenomena and forms of reasoning or agency. She is also interested in how such normative phenomena fit into a naturalistic understanding of the world.

Books
Recent Publications

Epistemic Authority without Instrumentalism. Forthcoming in Inquiry, Symposium on Nathaniel Sharadin’s book Epistemic Instrumentalism Explained.

Metanormative Constructivism as Non-Reductive Perspectivalism. In The Future of Normativity, ed. Kirchin, S. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2025). https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198927761.003.0009

The Normative-Explanatory Nexus and the Nature of Reasons. Jurisprudence 15(1): 77-95 (2024).
https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2023.2297582

Practical Inferences. In Agency, Norms, Inquiry, and Artifacts: Essays in Honor of Risto Hilpinen.
Eds. Paul McNamara, Mark Brown, and Andrew Jones. Springer (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-9ract0749-5_10

Rationality and Supervenience: A Comment on Broome (and Lord). Australasian Philosophical Review Vol. 4 Issue 4 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1080/24740500.2021.1964238

Doubts about “Genuinely Normative” Epistemic Reasons. In Metaepistemology, ed. Whiting, D., Way, J. & McHugh, C. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2019).https://global.oup.com/academic/product/metaepistemology-9780198805366?cc=us&lang=en&

Doing Away with the “Shmagency” Objection to Constitutivism. Manuscrito 41 (4):431-480 (2018). Special issue on Agency & Rationality, ed. Sergio Tenenbaum & David Horst. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2018.v41n4.hp

The “Just Too Different” Objection to Normative Naturalism. Philosophy Compass 13 (2):1-13 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12473

Internalism and Externalism about Reasons. In The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity, ed. Daniel Star. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2018). https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-reasons-and-normativity-9780199657889?cc=us&lang=en&

Can There Be Government House Reasons for Action? Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy 12:56-93 (2017). https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v12i1.213